LeanAideTools
This repository is intended to contain useful tools while minimizing dependencies to allow use with/without mathlib and also while developing (a branch of) mathlib. I hope to also have a branch/tag for each lean toolchain version.
At present, there is a single tool, for running tactics automatically in the background to try to complete proofs.
Running tactics automatically
While proving results in tactic mode in Lean, proofs can often be completed by tactics like simp
, exact?
, aesop
etc., but it is a nuisance to try this at each step. We provide a tactic mode where a list of tactics is run automatically in the background after each step.
If a proof can be completed, then:
- A hyperlink in the infoview and a code action is offered to replace the code by a valid proof.
- The
sorry
tactic is run to complete the proof, so the user sees a warning (this is to avoid showing an error, following a suggestion by Bolton Bailey).
To work with this mode, follow the below installation instructions, including adding import LeanAideTools
to your file. You can enter the auto-tactic mode by:
- Beginning a tactic block with
byy
instead ofby
. - At any stage, starting a sequence of tactics with
doo
.
The doo
syntax is provided as, at present, the mode does not see within case
, match
, bullet points etc., so one has to use it to re-enter the auto-tactic mode in these cases.
The tactics that run by default are rfl
, simp?
, omega
, aesop?
, exact?
. More tactics can be added as long as they are in scope. For example, in a Mathlib dependent project (or a branch of Mathlib) one may
want to add linarith
and ring
. One can add either a single tactic or multiple tactics as in the following.
#auto ring
#autos [ring, linarith]
Examples in action
Here are some examples illustrating the tactic mode.
Simple Example
In the following simple example, the result can be proved straight away. The syntax byy
by itself is valid and tries to prove the goal.
Checks after each tactic
In the following (rather contrived) example, the result cannot be proved automatically. However, once the tactic rw [silly]
is entered the proof is completed and results are suggested.
Background Running
The following shows that the tactics are running in the background. After the tactics to run are spawned, there is a configurable delay, 50 milliseconds by default, before control is returned to the user. The tactics continue running in the background till they finish after this delay.
Here the delay is set to 0
. Hence after rw [silly]
the proof is not automatically completed. Every time the interpreter is triggered we check whether the proof was found by the background processes. In this case, hitting enter triggered the interpreter which found that the proof was found in the background.
Configuration: Adding tactics
The following illustrates adding tactics. Here simp [silly]
is added. In the presence of this tactic the example can be proved straight away.
Installation
Add the following or equivalent to your lakefile.lean
to use the auto-tactic mode. The branch/tag v4.7.0
works with the corresponding version of Lean's toolchain. Replace it with the toolchain you use in your project. I will try to have a branch/tag for each toolchain starting with v4.7.0-rc2
.
require LeanAideTools from git
"https://github.com/siddhartha-gadgil/LeanAideTools.git" @ "v4.7.0"
For use with a Mathlib
branch, add the dependency in the lakefile while working on the branch and remove it before the PR is merged.
To use the mode in a file, add import LeanAideTools
along with your other imports.
Missing features?
There are two features that I hope to work on eventually:
-
When a tactic like
exact?
finds a proof, the user gets a hyperlink and code-action to complete the proof with this tactic. But this tactic in turn gives a suggested proof with which it can be replaced. The two steps should ideally be replaced by just one. -
The tactic mode does not see within
case
,match
, bullet points etc. This is a limitation of the current implementation. Thedoo
syntax is provided to re-enter the auto-tactic mode in these cases, but ideally one should not have to do this.
Any comments, suggestions, or bug reports are welcome. Also contributions are welcome.